rorkesdriftvc.com Forum Index


rorkesdriftvc.com
Discussions related to the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879
Reply to topic
Numbers at Rorke's Drift
Simon


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 95
Reply with quote
Hi,

Just out of interest what is the consensus of the numbers of antagonists (on both sides) at Rorke�s Drift?

Obviously the Zulu one can be at best �a best guess� but the figure of 4000 was/is always bandied around. Did all the Zulus who marched on Rorke�s Drift get there or did a number wander off to destroy kraals etc around the area?

On the British side � 139 is the general number quoted but I have read that is could be into the 150�s.

Cheers

Simon
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
John Young


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 1020
Location: Lower Sheering, Essex
Reply with quote
Simon,

I think you'll find 139 was proved to be incorrect several years ago. Despite that the same old number still appears in more recent publications.

John Y.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Keith Smith


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 540
Location: Northern NSW, Australia
Reply with quote
In case Julian Whybra is not able to respond, his excellent England's Sons, my copy of which may be out of date, shows the defenders as 154, with a further two possibles from B Company, the 2/24th.

KIS
View user's profileSend private message
Simon


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 95
Reply with quote
Cheers Keith,

I'll look out for Sons of England.

Simon
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Julian whybra


Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Posts: 437
Reply with quote
Actually I'm now up to 155 present plus a possible 3 more. England's Sons is available from Martin at the Museum.
View user's profileSend private message
a.j


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 80
Location: Thornaby-On-Tees, Great Britain
Reply with quote
Let's say someone was doing a presentation on the defence of Rorke's Drift what would be a definite number of defenders to state?
View user's profileSend private message
Peter Ewart


Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 1797
Location: Near Canterbury, Kent, England.
Reply with quote
a.j.

155-158! England's Sons supersedes all previous calculations - from whichever source. The 139 figure, still mentioned here and there as JY points out, has long been out of date. The 155 can all be named - and quite a few others have been eliminated.

I was still thinking 152-154, but that's because my edition of ES (always a work in progress) is not the latest. Time for me to update, I suppose! So the answer (today) is 155 with absolute certainty, with possibly up to three more - and it is not impossible that even that may change, but not below 155.

Peter
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Numbers at Rorke's Drift
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Reply to topic