 |
| Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:55 pm |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
Thank you Alan for putting me straight about your brother/son. and i fully, as stated before, completely understand your position. one bad apple and all that. and I'm sure the party involved can look ...
|
| Sat Dec 20, 2008 3:35 pm |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
Well shame on you Peter! i agree moderation is the norm in " civilized "
society, so why you felt the need to count to ten after reading my post intrigue's me slightly, what I'm saying is, ...
|
| Sat Dec 20, 2008 11:25 am |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
Thank you Harman for your mainly very informative contributions, I'm sad at this turn of events not least because I'm sure you never went deliberately out of your way to be outright offensive, but may ...
|
| Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:49 pm |
| 6 |
| 9537 |
|
|
Great story Michael, that really made me chuckle.The Regimental Colour was in fact safely lodged at Helpmaaker. it was the only one, out of the two Battalions that they managed to hold onto, till the ...
|
| Fri Dec 19, 2008 4:49 pm |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
Thank you Martin and Bill for your insights. the court of inquiry would of course have been hypothetical. this is my last post on this thread, thank you all for making it interesting, but there's no p ...
|
| Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:37 am |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
I offer this without prejudice or comment, could Coghill have joined up with his Regiment.?
" Notwithstanding the loss of their commanding officer, more than three quarter's of the
1st Battal ...
|
| Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:33 am |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
Hi Bill, are you suggesting for one moment that Coghill did not " flee " the battlefield. ( that some how he ambled away at a leisurely pace ) and please excuse my spelling in my last post d ...
|
| Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:59 pm |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
Well said Harman P. consistant as usual. your driving this forum along at the moment. well done for that last post. regard's Leslie.
|
| Wed Dec 17, 2008 12:51 am |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
" If he had survived ". thank you Martin. for the rest well said. regard's Leslie.
|
| Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:49 pm |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
So sorry Mel, i do go back over the thread many times and i did see your direct question, my answer I'm afraid is the same as most. we simply don't have enough information regarding Coghill's movment' ...
|
| Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:34 pm |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
i think the cap might just fit me, but i alway's believe a spade is just that. a spade. who say's debate should alway's be one dimentional. and that theory's should not be advanced. when posing all my ...
|
| Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:38 pm |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
I'm truly sorry Peter, i of course never considered for a moment that i was'nt " giving other people a chance ". my only intention was to try and further the debate on Coghill,and I'm equall ...
|
| Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:35 am |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
Thank you Alan for your gentle prodding. yes the thing is that i have posed the question on the manner of Coghill's departure from Isandhlwana in various way's but cannot seem to get a straight answ ...
|
| Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:19 am |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
Well what can i say, i suppose its to be expected. judging by the replies and views of this particular thread ( we know who you are ) lol. who would suppose that no one would pick up my Gauntlet.hist ...
|
| Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:13 pm |
| 179 |
| 204465 |
|
|
Peter. thank's as always for your patience.your fullsome repost's are always informative.. i gain from your reply that your primary source is the redoutable William's. who I'm sure did'nt need to be t ...
|
| Page 1 of 4 |
All times are GMT |
| |
